AI agency in Cambridge
Cambridge researches and regulates : medical device and biotech companies on the science parks, software firms spun out of the university, engineering consultancies, and the professional services around them. Every device, every trial, every product lives under a regulation that changes — and someone is supposed to be reading it. The task that costs most here is the regulatory watch : the guidance that was updated four months ago, discovered the week before the audit. We survey your ten systems, quantify what each one costs you, and open only one — without ever touching the clinical. The survey is free and delivered within 72 hours.
The tasks we remove first in this area
Four sectors, four tasks that cost.
A city page is worth nothing if it could be the page of the next city over. Here are the sectors we are most often called for here, the task that keeps coming back in each, and the limit we set from the start.
Medtech, biotech and healthcare
Regulatory watch, audit preparation, supplier questionnaires, technical documentation.
A guidance document is updated in March. The quality team learns about it in July, the week before the notified-body audit, from the auditor.
No patient data passes through, no clinical decision is approached. The organisation's documents — never the patient's — and every regulatory document goes through a responsible person.
Software firms and sales teams
CRM updates from meeting notes, follow-ups, proposals, lead qualification.
A rep comes out of a good meeting with two pages of notes. The CRM is updated a week later — or never — and the follow-up promised for Tuesday goes out the following Monday.
No discount, no price, no commitment produced by the agent. It writes up and schedules ; the rep sends.
Engineering consultancies
Supplier questionnaires, customer audits, technical documentation, quoting.
A client sends its annual supplier questionnaire : forty questions, thirty of which were answered last year, in a file nobody can find.
No specification validated by the agent. It retrieves, pre-fills and cites ; the quality manager decides.
Professional services
Preparing contract review, assembling files, keeping up with changes.
A licensing agreement of eighty pages arrives. One hour of preparation — structure, cross-references, departures from the precedent — for one hour of billable reading.
No legal advice, ever. The agent flags a departure from the precedent ; whether it is acceptable stays with the solicitor.
Those four do not cover everything : Cambridge also has letting agents for whom AI for real estate describes the portal enquiry nobody calls back, banks, insurers, hospitality and logistics. The survey starts from your business, not from a list.
We are also called here for : AI for real estate, AI for banking, AI for insurance, AI for hospitality, AI for logistics, AI for pharmacies.
A medical device company of fifty people
A class IIa device sold in the UK and the EU, a quality and regulatory team of three, a technical file in two regulatory frameworks, and forty procedures that cite standards and guidance documents. The task that cost : Keep the regulatory watch: read the designated sources and flag what affects your procedures.
Updates from three regulators, two standards bodies and a notified body — newsletters, PDFs, web pages — several a week, most of them irrelevant, a few of them critical.
The regulatory lead reads what she can on Friday afternoon, flags what she recognises, and misses what she does not have time for. One to three changes a year are discovered late — by the auditor, or by a customer.
Two to three hours a week of a senior person on reading, procedures that cite superseded guidance, and findings at audit that were avoidable four months earlier.
The procedures cited every standard and guidance document they relied on — by name and version. Nobody had ever listed them in one place.
A list of the sources and of the documents each procedure cites, first. Then an agent that reads every update from the designated sources, matches it against that list, and flags what affects a procedure — with the exact excerpt, the date, and the procedure concerned. Nothing else reaches the team. The regulatory lead reads the flags, interprets, and decides.
A relevant change is flagged the week it is published, not four months later. The regulatory lead reads ten minutes of flags a week instead of three hours of newsletters — and interprets, which only she can do.
The agent never interprets a regulation and never updates a procedure : it flags that something changed, quotes it, and names the procedure concerned. What it means and what to do stay with the regulatory lead — and every regulatory document goes through her before it is used.
This case is a working scenario, built from tasks we meet in this area. It is not the engagement of an identifiable client, and no figure above is presented as a result measured at a third party.
What the machine does, step by step.
There is nothing magical about an automation scenario : it is a sequence of steps you can read, stop and correct. Here is the one for the case above, in the order it runs.
Schematic drawing. The real scenario is built in your automation tool and stays editable by you.
Ten systems, one survey, one system opened at a time — the one with the shortest payback. Read the full method, or go back to the AI agency page.
What the closed system costs, what the open system returns.
Ranges, not promises : the real gap depends on your volumes and the state of your documents. That is exactly what the survey measures before we commit.
What we are asked before we start.
Do you touch clinical or patient data ?
No, and it is written into the quote. The agent reads regulators' publications and your procedures — never a patient record, never clinical data. Technically it has no access ; it is not only an instruction.
Flagging a change — isn't that already an interpretation ?
No : « this guidance was updated on this date and your procedure 12 cites it » is a fact, checkable in one click. What the change means for your device is the interpretation — and the agent never makes it.
How long before it is useful ?
The survey of the ten systems is delivered within 72 hours. Opening the first system takes two to six weeks. For the watch, listing what your procedures cite is what takes the time — not the technology.
You are based in France. Do you come to Cambridge ?
Yes, for the survey workshop : we need to see the screens and the tools. The rest runs remotely, with a weekly call. Cambridge and the East of England are covered with no travel surcharge.
Our other locations in the United Kingdom.
We will tell you which system to open first.
Describe the task that costs you the most. We will tell you what is feasible, how long it takes and what it costs. If the answer is no, you will leave with the two reasons why.